Full Text
Full Text PDF
Abstract
Hyperbaric oxygen for sudden sensorineural deafness: when guideline development goes astray. Problem: This article uses a clinical example to describe the need, when formulating a guideline, to include all evidence levels in the deliberations leading to the recommendations.
Methodology: A narrative review, in which the different viewpoints on a recent guideline from the Dutch Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery are described.
Results: The guideline committee on sensorineural hearing loss is not abiding by its own rules in respect of formulating their guideline. Furthermore, a narrow evaluation of the literature is not useful for practice guidelines. A restrictive interpretation of evidence-based medicine (EBM), as well as the formulation of overly directive recommendations, has adverse implications for maintaining the range of treatment options, which could be important in the context of shared decision-making.
Conclusion: For a practice guideline, a broad approach to the presentation of evidence and practice-based recommendations is required.
Similar Articles
Article Info
Published In
Journal
B-ENT
Volume / Issue
Volume 13 · Issue 2
Pages
97-104
History
Published Online
June 15, 2017
Affiliations
J.A. de Ru
Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
A. Koole
Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
R.D. Bol Raap
Hyperbaar Geneeskundig Centrum Rijswijk, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
D.N. Teguh
Department of Surgery/Hyperbaric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
R.A. van Hulst
Department of Surgery/Hyperbaric Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Cite this Article
Ru, J. de, Koole, A., Raap, R. B., Teguh, D., & Hulst, R. van. (2017). Hyperbaric oxygen for sudden sensorineural deafness: when guideline development goes astray. B-ENT, 13(2), 97–104. Retrieved from https://www.b-ent.be/index.php/pub/article/view/669
Outlines