Original Article

Open surgery versus primary radiotherapy in T4b sinonasal carcinoma

Volume 14 · Issue 2 Publish Date: June 15, 2018
Full Text PDF
J. Debacker
Department of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
W. Huvenne
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
K. Bonte
Department of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
W. De Neve
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
P. Deron
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
P. Ost
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
T. Van Zele
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
H. Vermeersch
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
F. Duprez
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Debacker, J., Huvenne, W., Bonte, K., Neve, W. D., Deron, P., Ost, P., … Duprez, F. (2018). Open surgery versus primary radiotherapy in T4b sinonasal carcinoma. B-ENT, 14(2), 93–99. Retrieved from https://www.b-ent.be/index.php/pub/article/view/709
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Open surgery versus primary radiotherapy in T4b sinonasal carcinoma. Objectives: We evaluated the outcome after primary open surgery with adjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with primary IMRT in patients diagnosed with T4b sinonasal carcinoma. Methodology: Between 1998 and 2016, 20 patients with T4b sinonasal adenocarcinoma were treated with primary IMRT (n=10) with a high dose to achieve maximal locoregional control or adjuvant IMRT following open surgery (n=10). Results: With a median follow-up of 13.2 months, overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 55.0% and 15.2%, respectively; disease-specific survival rates were 47.8% and 23.9%, respectively; and disease-free survival rates were 45.0% and 22.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found between primary surgery and primary IMRT. Conclusions: Based on our limited, though homogeneous, patient cohort of cT4b sinonasal adenocarcinomas, we did not detect differences in outcome between primary surgery followed by adjuvant IMRT vs. primary IMRT. Thus, we have chosen to avoid open surgery, due to the bad prognosis and its invasiveness, by performing organ-sparing IMRT as the primary treatment for these patients.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal B-ENT
Volume / Issue Volume 14 · Issue 2
Pages 93-99
History
Published Online June 15, 2018
Affiliations
J. Debacker
Department of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
W. Huvenne
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
K. Bonte
Department of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
W. De Neve
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
P. Deron
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
P. Ost
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
T. Van Zele
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
H. Vermeersch
Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
F. Duprez
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Cite this Article
Debacker, J., Huvenne, W., Bonte, K., Neve, W. D., Deron, P., Ost, P., … Duprez, F. (2018). Open surgery versus primary radiotherapy in T4b sinonasal carcinoma. B-ENT, 14(2), 93–99. Retrieved from https://www.b-ent.be/index.php/pub/article/view/709
Outlines