Original Article

Is There a Coexistence Between Smaller Maxillary and Frontal Sinus Volume and Narrow Internal Nasal Valve Angle? Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment

Volume 19 · Issue 1 Publish Date: January 15, 2023
Full Text PDF
DOI
Selçuk Yıldız
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Ayşe Özlem Balık
Department of Radiology,Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Sema Zer Toros
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Yıldız, S., Balık, A. Özlem, & Zer Toros, S. (2023). Is There a Coexistence Between Smaller Maxillary and Frontal Sinus Volume and Narrow Internal Nasal Valve Angle? Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment. B-ENT, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.5152/B-ENT.2023.22986
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: Pneumatization of paranasal sinuses varies greatly between patients, and certain pneumatization variants have been associated with specific clinical conditions. The present research aimed to evaluate the presence of coexistence smaller maxillary and frontal sinus volume and narrow internal nasal valve angle and whether this association is significant. Methods: Sixty patients aged above 18 years old who underwent surgery for caudal septal deviation at the ear nose throat department of a tertiary care hospital between 2018 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. The internal nasal valve angle was measured from reformatted coronal computed tomography scans. The maxillary sinus volume and frontal sinus volume were calculated using a workstation. The maxillary sinus and frontal sinus volumes were classified as narrow side and wide side according to the internal nasal valve angle measurements. The narrow- and wide-side maxillary sinus and frontal sinus volumes were compared within each other. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the maxillary sinus volumes of the narrow internal nasal valve angle side and wide internal nasal valve angle side (mean ± SD: 14.47 ± 5.45 and 15.21 ± 5.31 mL, respectively, P=.014). There was a statistically significant difference between the frontal sinus volumes of the narrow internal nasal valve angle side and wide internal nasal valve angle side (median: 2.85 and 3.08 mL, respectively, P < .001). Conclusion: The maxillary sinus and frontal sinus volumes ipsilateral to the narrow internal nasal valve angle sides were significantly decreased. This coexistence may be significant. Further studies are needed to explain the significance of this association. Cite this article as: Yıldız S, Balık AÖ, Zer Toros S. Is there a coexistence between smaller maxillary and frontal sinus volume and narrow internal nasal valve angle? three-dimensional computed tomography assessment. B-ENT. 2023;19(1):9-13.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal B-ENT
Volume / Issue Volume 19 · Issue 1
Pages 9-13
History
Published Online January 15, 2023
Affiliations
Selçuk Yıldız
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Ayşe Özlem Balık
Department of Radiology,Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Sema Zer Toros
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Cite this Article
Yıldız, S., Balık, A. Özlem, & Zer Toros, S. (2023). Is There a Coexistence Between Smaller Maxillary and Frontal Sinus Volume and Narrow Internal Nasal Valve Angle? Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment. B-ENT, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.5152/B-ENT.2023.22986
Outlines